Understanding the Dynamics of Israeli Colonialism in Marrakech
The situation unfolding in Marrakech is profoundly complex, shedding light on the harsh realities of Israeli colonialism. The symbolic act of discarding keys and locks into the Atlantic Ocean represents a definitive stance against the Israeli state, emphasizing the absence of genuine mutual relations between Morocco and Israel. There exists no shared language, geography, religion, ethnicity, or interests that could bind a Moroccan to a state that views them merely as an extension of its own territory. This sentiment echoes the thoughts of Malek Bennabi, who spoke of the susceptibility of nations to colonialism, subjugation, and humiliation.
Recent diplomatic maneuvers aimed at expanding diplomatic representation between Morocco and Israel appear to be a mere reiteration of a distorted reality. The so-called "strange" relationship has reached unprecedented levels of engagement, devoid of an embassy or physical representation, reminiscent of a narrative spun without substance or authenticity. Presently, the Israeli colonial presence in Morocco is unmistakable, marked by a pervasive lack of resistance or rebellion, sparking discussions among some Moroccans who ironically wish for overt colonialism as a means to escape the humiliation they feel under the rule of the sixth king.
Perception of Power and Diplomatic Relations
The Israeli leaders have adopted a grandiose view of their state, positioning themselves as a global powerhouse comparable to Russia and the United States, and even more formidable than many European nations. They exhibit little hesitation in "embarrassing" Arab nations by asserting their independence from the need to normalize relations with countries lacking substantial power. In this context, those Arab nations pursuing diplomatic ties are perceived as desperate, labeled derogatorily as "baboons," creating a narrative where only one entity stands to gain: the Israeli state. This shift is exemplified by the UAE's transformation into a blank check for Netanyahu, while Morocco morphs into a testing ground for agricultural, military, and espionage experiments—an unprecedented diplomatic relationship in historical terms.
Colonialism is defined as the exertion of control by a powerful nation over a weaker one, using military or political power to exploit its resources and labor. An examination of the current relationship between the Kingdom of Morocco and the Israeli state reveals a stark reality; it is fundamentally rooted in the essence of colonialism. The ongoing exploitation of agricultural land, property, and political decision-making cannot escape the definition of colonialism. Moreover, the inability—or perhaps the unwillingness—to criticize a perpetrator committing genocide against a people who share your language and faith underscores the very essence of colonialism, revealing an inherent susceptibility to oppression that seems etched into the fabric of history.
Those who witnessed the interactions between Moroccan Foreign Minister Nasser Bourita and his Israeli counterpart Gidon Sa'ar—exchanging glances, whispers, smiles, and silence—could sense the underlying message of their meeting. It is a relationship marked by a lack of genuine emotion or hope, where a once-resilient kingdom finds itself under the sway of a state that has managed to colonize without firing a single shot.
As reported by echoroukonline.com.
