Benkirane's Call for Inquiry and Political Reactions
In a recent political development, Abdelilah Benkirane, the Secretary-General of Morocco's Justice and Development Party (PJD), has stirred controversy following his request directed at King Mohammed VI to form a committee investigating the circumstances surrounding the mass migration towards the occupied city of Ceuta. While some critics have labeled his remarks as a breach of institutional protocols, others view them as a legitimate part of the political discourse regarding the implications of these migration events. Political science professor Abdel Hafid Liyounsi noted that Benkirane's statements are being utilized for political score-settling and to deepen discussions about accountability, grounded in a constitutional context that pertains to the roles of political parties and the monarchy.
Rachid Lazraq elucidated that Benkirane's request aims to shift the conversation from mere security management to political and social accountability, emphasizing that the migration phenomenon reflects a crisis of trust and hope among youth. He urged for comprehensive policies that transcend a purely security-oriented approach, showcasing a need for a broader dialogue that addresses the root causes of such migrations.
Contextualizing Benkirane's Request
In light of the ongoing discussions around Benkirane's statements and the limits of political communication between party actors and the monarchy within Morocco's political system, Liyounsi argues that Benkirane's inquiry into the events in Ceuta is grounded in constitutional foundations. Specifically, he references Article 7 of the Moroccan Constitution, which stipulates that political parties are responsible for the civic engagement of citizens, and Article 42, which designates the King as the Head of State. This constitutional basis adds weight to Benkirane's request for transparency regarding the events that transpired at the end of last month.
Furthermore, Liyounsi pointed out that the monarchy has historically managed critical issues, including the notable Mediterranean Lighthouse project in Al Hoceima. He also highlighted the respect that Benkirane has consistently shown towards the monarchy, rooted in an Islamic legal perspective regarding the relationship with leaders. In this context, Lazraq posits that Benkirane's appeal for a royal inquiry signifies a transition from an immediate security reaction to a deeper political and social accountability, especially considering that the influx of young migrants is not merely a geographical issue but also reflects profound societal frustrations and a lack of social and economic integration opportunities.
Lazraq noted that the significance of such an inquiry lies not only in identifying accountability but also in understanding the structural reasons behind youth migration as a collective manifestation of despair. He emphasized that passing the matter to the royal institution elevates it beyond governmental and party conflicts, framing it within a broader question of the efficacy of public policies and the capacity of institutions to restore trust and generate social hope.
Ultimately, addressing these events requires more than just security measures; it necessitates more effective policies in employment, education, social justice, and youth integration, ensuring a holistic approach to the issues at hand.
As reported by alaraby.co.uk.
